
Key takeaways
- Separate requirements you cannot compromise on from preferences you can trade off.
- Compare every shortlisted route using the same household assumptions and decision questions.
- End the brief with evidence to obtain and a next action, rather than a score that hides uncertainty.
Define what would make an option useful
Start the brief with the decision you are trying to make and who it affects. Describe the outcome you need, the capital you are prepared to commit and the practical constraints on your time. Keep it to a short paragraph. If a reader cannot understand the objective without seeing the shortlist, clarify the objective first.
Divide your criteria into requirements and preferences. A requirement is something the plan must answer, such as the intended household outcome. A preference is something you may trade against another benefit. Avoid declaring every attractive feature essential; that makes it harder to see why an option deserves further investigation or should leave the list.
Compare like questions across different routes
Use the same headings for every option: outcome, applicant fit, financial commitment, practical obligations and open questions. Paraguay, Hungary and Turkey provide different program structures in the linked records. Those differences are useful to the comparison only when you explain what each would mean for your particular objective.
Keep the exact route name and household assumptions beside each entry. Record the original currency, distinguish an investment from a cost, and note which amounts still need a quotation. If an answer is absent, write unconfirmed. An empty field should prompt a question rather than become an assumed advantage over another option.
Show the evidence behind the answer
Beside each important conclusion, note where the information came from and when you will need to confirm it again. Distinguish a program record, a provider's proposal and advice specific to your case. This lets the next person in the discussion see which parts are established for planning and which still depend on an assessment.
Do not force uncertainty into a precise score. Instead, identify the question most likely to change the decision: an applicant's eligibility, an unresolved total cost or the practicality of maintaining the status. Ask who can answer it and what information they need from you. Resolving that question may be more useful than adding another country.
End with a decision and a next action
Give each option a clear next step: investigate further, hold until a named question is answered, or set aside with a reason. Keep the brief with the supporting records and revise it when your assumptions change. The aim is a conversation that advances your decision, supported by visible evidence and a shortlist you can explain.
The programs, side by side
| Fact | Hungary Golden Visa | Paraguay Permanent Residency | Turkey Citizenship by Investment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | Multiple routes | Multiple routes | Multiple routes |
| Timeline | 2 to 3 months | 3 months | 3 to 5 months |
| Outcome | Long-term residency · Path to citizenship | Permanent residency | Direct citizenship |
| Family | Spouse, minor children, adult dependent children | Spouse, minor children | Spouse, minor children, adult dependent children |
Figures are indicative and subject to verification.
Sources and methodology
- Paraguay Permanent ResidencyAdapted from https://www.wealthyexpat.com/programs/paraguay-residency; source retrieved 2026-09-06. Figures are indicative and require current confirmation.
- Hungary Golden VisaAdapted from https://www.wealthyexpat.com/programs/hungary-residency; source retrieved 2026-09-06. Figures are indicative and require current confirmation.
- Turkey Citizenship by InvestmentAdapted from https://www.wealthyexpat.com/programs/turkey-citizenship; source retrieved 2026-09-06. Figures are indicative and require current confirmation.


